The Third Law of Action-Reaction Was Applied Incorrectly

Experts in the field of physics could not explain how the upper section alone could have destroyed all the lower sections of the tower.

This is the reason why the top section of the tower totally destroyed the whole tower under the Newton first law of acceleration and the law of conservation of linear momentum, applied correctly and under the right temperature.

The September 11 twin towers unexpected collapse was a normal collapse under the applicable laws of physics; but was viewed as [a]normal and [un]explainable.

Over 2000 experts with extensive background in engineering including NIST experts misinterpreted the two main laws of physics, the Newton third law of motion and the principle of conservation of momentum where, although there was about 200 thousand tons of steel structure below the area of impact, the extremely hot temperature of steel of the top section impacted the bottom like a Thor hammer where the third law of motion could not destroy the upper section.

This was not a small chunk, but a 50 thousand tons of red-hot structural steel.

Simply, the top section had enough kinetic energy force to destroy the rest of the bottom cold brittle sections only because the very hot furnace temperatures from within the tower and the very cold temperature of the bottom section of the towers of the city of New York made the perfect combination to form a new metal maintaining and enhancing its elasticity therefore destroying the whole tower like a pretzel.

On 2020, I explained how the difference in temperature affected the elasticity of steel behaving differently where the third law of motion Can Not be used as example in this case.

The third law of action-reaction was a very bad example to explain the collapse of the towers, and this is why nothing made sense.

It's established that nothing can be below [a] falling object, in order for it to achieve  acceleration and terminal velocity under the applicable laws; where in this case, office space with all the furniture is not a contributing factor that restricted or slowed down the downward momentum of the massive kinetic energy of 50 thousand tons of mass; except and only for the massive vertical columns supporting the 250 thousand tons structure; understanding that steel vibrates differently under different cold temperatures excluding hot temperatures, and that this same vibration at a very high pitch can cause the steel to break in specific areas also causing concrete to shatter.

The tower was designed to sustain compression forces such as critical bending and critical buckling but not shear or torsion stress forces, due to its tube design with a center shaft of high tensile concrete composed of 4 massive bars of compressed steel, like the ones they use in bridges, also reinforced with high tensile concrete.

Although the downward momentum of the collapse was somewhat linear, it was influenced by shear torsion making it vulnerable to the upper load impact stress compression of 50k tons.

Literally, nothing will stop the downward momentum of 50k tons unless the third law of Motion is present where kinetic energy converts into destruction, as a mass can still have kinetic energy after being deformed and reason being the top section destroyed all the bottom ones.

What people actually heard and saw that day, was not detonations from explosives, but the actual steel bars covered by high tension concrete breaking one by one while the tower started collapsing and this similar effect happens with explosives with adiabatic expansion like in the case of RDX or subsonic expansion speed like in the case of TNT.

Below you will find the Newton third law in progress under different temperatures and basic illustration why in this case the kinetic energy of two identical objects with equal physical properties cannot destroy each other equally by only applying the Newton Third Law of motion. 

If the Twin Towers had been located in Miami, Florida, only the top would have collapsed where the top 15 floors would have pancaked onto the 15 bottom ones, according to the Third Law of Action-Reaction where all equal and opposing forces destroy each other.

Temperature is not always a factor to weaken or destroy structures in minutes, there is also the element of resonance or high pitch vibration called flutter that can destroy an aircraft sending it to the ground.

According to experts including NIST, the collapse violated important laws of physics that could not be explained to the extend they entertained the possibility of controlled demolition to be the cause for the collapse.

The Collapse of both towers was Perfectly Legal Under the Second Law of Acceleration and the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum; not the Third law of Action-Reaction.

To understand what I will explain below, please review the sections above where I explain the Third Law of Action-Reaction under different temperatures where 1/3 of the top section destroyed the 2/3's of the sections below.